Shelby County v. Holder 2013

Was the Voting Rights Act’s formula for which jurisdictions needed federal approval of voting changes still constitutional?

570 U.S. 529 (2013)Voting and elections
The question
Was the Voting Rights Act’s formula for which jurisdictions needed federal approval of voting changes still constitutional?
What the Court held
No. The coverage formula in Section 4(b), based on decades-old data, was unconstitutional.
The vote
5–4

This page summarizes the Court’s judgment in neutral terms. The opinion, concurrences and dissents are the authority; read them for the reasoning.

Where the question came from. The events behind it.

1965

Voting Rights Act of 1965

August 6, 1965 · Expansion of rights

Bans literacy tests and other devices used to deny the vote on account of race, and requires covered jurisdictions to obtain federal approval before changing voting rules.

Source: National Archives

A Stacklumen Product